Jan 19 2013

2012 favorites: reading

favorite books read in 2012

I meant to write little review posts about each of these and never did. I still might, because I have things I’d like to say about each of them. This year was a totally indulgent reading year. I gravitated towards pure mood and pleasure reading most of the time. These were the notables:

Steal Like an Artist: 10 Things Nobody Told You About Being Creative
The Casual Vacancy
Insurgent
The Last Little Blue Envelope
Tiny Beautiful Things: Advice on Love and Life from Dear Sugar
The Fault in Our Stars
Boy Proof
Bitterblue
A Storm of Swords
Fire
Divergent
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
Graceling
The Wave: In Pursuit of the Rogues, Freaks, and Giants of the Ocean

 



me on GoodReads »

favorite writing online in 2012

I actively enjoy reading on the internet as a hobby and consider it a valuable use of time, as much as sitting the newspaper on sunday and reading books – same enjoyment, different moods. I remember someone tweeting a joke about google reader graveyards last year (like who still follows entire blogs anymore? uhhh. I do!)  I’m one of those holdovers that transitioned (just barely and way recently) from my feed reader to a neverending instapaper holding cell.

In 2012, it seemed I couldn’t stop discovering great online projects, zines and columns to follow. These were standouts to regularly check:

 

Storychord.com

  Storychord – a Sarah Lynn Knowles project featuring consistently fantastic writers, artists and musicians.

Thomas Page McBee - The Rumpus.net

Self-Made Man  - a column (on The Rumpus) by Thomas Page McBee, who is doing some of the most insightful and important writing about gender, bodies and otherness to happen in the last decade.

Brain Pickings

Brain Pickings - Maria Popova is the apex of curation culture online. Utterly addictive and delightful.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Email

Feb 19 2012

Seven thoughts about “Breakfast at Tiffany’s”

I just watched this movie and then was sitting down to write a different blog post, but I couldn’t focus because all of this was stuck in my brain. A movie is never just a movie. These are the type of things I think about.

See also: times when I wish I could turn off my “critical analysis” mechanism.

1. I’ve seen this movie dozen of times. Why is it that I always forget how truly awful Mickey Rooney’s racist character and performance is? Really bad. Really, really offensive and bad.  And purposefully so, even within the context of the time period.

2. Times may change, but vapid parties are forever. Apparently huge parties based on image over substance are an constant in this universe.  Wealth and hipsters then, wealth and hipsters now.

3. I love Audrey deeply. She obviously created this film character the the movie version of Holly is iconic. However, I can also never watch this without thinking of the parallel character of Holly from the book. The other Holly, I always imagined, looks more like a young Mia Farrow.  That Holly is a scrawny chameleon tomboy/bohemian/socialite mash-up. I always imagined her as a different kind of woman who ran on charm more than natural elegance, where the movie Holly has that streak and is quirky, but still kind of floats through on Audrey’s grace.

4. That emotional scene where she says to Doc “Stop calling me that, I’m not your Lulamae anymore.” never sits right with me.  It’s directed well and Audrey brings the emotion perfectly, but there is a complexity that the writing never gets at.  Because she both is (in terms of how parts of us are different to different people) and never was Lulamae (because whoever she decides Holly is, even if she is constantly reinventing herself, that is always the truest part, the most vital part). None of the lines in this movie really speak to that, especially the end. Which brings me to another point…

5. That whole bit about her running away and keeping herself in cages at the end… You know, the part where the dude tells her all about herself  - even though I understand how and why it fits for the movie’s love story – I don’t care for it. She’s way too complex for that. I just wish that the script, in some places, let Holly be that complex.  She is treated as a broken thing. Her quirks and choices are seen as escapes and defenses. And maybe some of them are, but that really isn’t for anyone else to say, especially not anyone who is trying to love her. The movie could have handled a bit more of her complexity, humanity. Audrey certainly could have handled it as an actress – she would have ripped it open, the way she does in The Children’s Hour when she has to dance through 800 levels of “not talking about being a lesbian” – the tension in that movie is incredible. Breakfast at Tiffany’s lacks some tension where it would have potentially been brilliant.

6. The book is not a love story, or rather it is, but not a romantic love story. The narrator in the book (the writer, whom she calls Fred) is gay. It’s a story about connection. It’s a story about human stories. I love this movie, but again, when the culmination is a confrontation and kiss-in-the-rain scene, I really actually prefer Capote’s original vision. The one that ends with Fred sitting in a bar thinking about this girl he used to know. Where no one is ever allowed to keep Holly.  Even Holly.

7. I wonder if the dude who wrote that terrible “What About Breakfast at Tiffany’s” song in the 90’s ever actually saw this fucking movie. That is one of the worst and most disingenuous songs about breaking up/staying together ever.

Sidenote:  I always find it odd that Audrey sings in this movie and does a lovely job, but they wouldn’t allow her to sing in My Fair Lady. What was that about?

Fun trivia: Marni Nixon, who sings in My Fair Lady also was the dubbing voice for Maria, and some of Anita’s vocal parts in West Side Story. She got paid shit for it too and often the actresses were kept in the dark about what they were actually recording. So it was a totally fucked situation for all the women involved.  And also, my heart broke a little the day I found out that Nathalie Wood didn’t really sing!

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Email

Nov 1 2008

It’s NaNoWriMo!

Yep.  It’s that time of year again, when tons of writers challenge themselves to write a novel in only 30 days!  National Novel Writing Month.   Their website this year says “Celebrating 10 years of literary abandon!”.    In case you haven’t heard of this, here is a brief introduction:

National Novel Writing Month is a fun, seat-of-your-pants approach to novel writing. Participants begin writing November 1. The goal is to write a 175-page (50,000-word) novel by midnight, November 30.

Valuing enthusiasm and perseverance over painstaking craft, NaNoWriMo is a novel-writing program for everyone who has thought fleetingly about writing a novel but has been scared away by the time and effort involved.

-From their “What is NaNoWriMo?“  page.

I love this concept.  I have never personally participated and have always wanted to.  Unfortunately this year, the timing just did not work out right.  I’ve already begun writing my novel.  I’m on Chapter 7.  So I can’t join in.

In place of actually signing up for it (which I think is a great motivator), my goal -in the spirit of NaNoWriMo- is to not get hung up on editing and tweaking in the process and just push though to finish my first draft of my book by November 30th at midnight.

I have been doing something similar anyway.  I ended up separating my writing processes into notes/pre-writing/outlines when I want to brainstorm or work something out and just straight writing – no stopping to fix/correct/rethink- when I’m actually writing the chapters.   This is working well for me, so I just need to keep on keeping on.

So that’s my challenge to myself.  My “unofficial” NaNoWriMo challenge.   I will report back and let you know how I’m doing.   And I will continue monitoring the real NaNoWriMo peeps who are going for it in the real 30-day only riot writing way, because they inspire me.   Good luck to you all, I can’t wait to read some writing that comes out of this!

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Email

Aug 13 2008

The Geek Out List: Special LOST Edition!

The thing I love about LOST spoilers that I find online is that I don’t need to avoid them. They never give away any information, just give us more to chew on. (and chew on and chew on and chew on… until January)

So here’s the juicyest new things I’ve heard/read/seen about the new season of LOST:

1. The title of the first episode of the new season will be “Because You Left”. (Via: EW)

2. Literary Nerdy + LOST Geeky = LOST Book Club LOVE LOVE LOVE!

The LOST book club is home to any and all literary references made on the show – from Stephen King to Kurt Vonnegut. Browse the book list and get all the details.

It’s ALL there. Now I know that the LOSTpedia has already run circles around every reference in the show to just about ANYTHING. So this isn’t exactly new information. But for an official show website feature, I have to say, the DESIGN of this is brilliant! You can view them indexed by season, by what kind of reference, or just peruse all the books in a very convenient little floating book widget thingie. Extremely fun to play with! You can also discuss the significance of the books with other fans in the forums. Thanks, ABC. I’m a fan.

3. Check out these totally HAWT promo pictures, released last week! (via Remote Access)

What does it all mean? I don’t know if these photos mean anything, except “Hey look at our sexy cast… don’t you want to see more of our sexy sexy cast in January?”

Not that it matters. They could draw a Dharma Initiative logo on a f’n cocktail napkin, scan it and leak it online and I would still be excited to find it. “A cocktail napkin? What does it all MEAN?”

Click the link to see the full spread. These are my two favorites:

Although, to clarify, I wouldn’t necessarily call Ben HOT… I don’t think that is the point. I think everyone in these photos was “dressed up” to fit their characters somehow. I picked the “Ben” photo as a favorite because it captured a kind of energy very strongly. That vest has a really sharp + vintage look that really suits his character – classy, yet still very mad professor.

And I don’t think I need to explain why the “Sun” picture was a favorite. She is one of my favorite characters and I love that she got the shiny, space-diva dress.

Oh and one more thing. I think Elizabeth Mitchell is gorgeous and I love the character of Juliet. So why does everyone else look glam or at least moderately spiffed-up and Juliet looks like you just caught her leaving a yoga class? Upon closer look, it appears that she is wearing a skirt, which would make the top look a little dressier. Kinda. Maybe it’s the colors? I don’t know, but I look at this and I see Fruit of the Loom commercial:

Maybe it’s just me. Thoughts?

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Email

Jul 31 2008

Book Review: The Host by Stephenie Meyer

In the midst of writing the explosively popular Twilight series, Stephenie Meyer departed into Sci-Fi territory with another emotionally compelling, character-driven novel, The Host. It proves to be a highly enjoyable read, but lacks enough depth or moxie to reach its full, deliciously-complicated potential.

Continue reading

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Email